Fucking hot man!
I'll say it:"Just because. Just because HE'S HOT!!"
Thank you.But how about HOW HOT?Could encourage more commenting.
Criticism? What can anyone criticize about beauty and the beasts? I don't understand it...
Criticism? What can anyone criticize about beauty and the beasts? I don't understand...
Hot. I want to bury my face in that chest.
If there was criticism , it was because they were always hot. Did you really need to ask.
Criticism? Oy. What is wrong with people? Sure they were unanimously hot but c'mon it's just supposed to be some fun eye candy for us to drool and comment about. Some folks are too silly for their own good.
I wish you would put where you found the picture or a link to find more pics of the person you found hot. Theres quite a few pictures where I would love to see more! Thanks for all the great work!!
I always thought it was a rhetorical question...
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU to the last person who just posted his comment! Over 489 HOT OR NOT posts and he is the VERY FIRST PERSON to realize it was a rhetorical question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Thank you. I had given up hope.....almost.Dave G ,Wicked Gay Blog
OMG I LOVE Hot or Not....UGH!
Thanks for hot or not. Too bad prissy,jealous.fools affected your decision to stop it.
The only thing I see is the afford you put in posting gorgeous men for us!!!! Thank you for that!!!!
I think every guy you've ever posted is hot. Maybe not my type, but hot.
I am one of the readers who mentioned that the men were always hot, but I certainly never intended it as a criticism. I didn't recognize that the question was rhetorical, but then again I never recognize rhetorical questions. No, I've never been diagnosed on the ADD-Aspergers-Autism spectrum, but I'm an engineer, so it's kind of expected. I'm sorry that I didn't understand. I find this blog to be like Mary Poppins, practically perfect in every way and I would like to thank you for the work you've done.
I would just like to say that I enjoyed every single "HOT or NOT?"
I did not think "Hot or Not?" was in anyway rhetorical but was an intriguing opportunity to get varied reaction to a given model. And, that was a worthwhile part of this blog. However, featuring obviously hot men was just an extension of "Just Because." You certainly don't need both categories if any rhetorical intent was the only focus of "Hot or Not?" Thus, simply having more Just Because's will certainly suit the purpose of showing off Hot guys.
I always thought it was rhetorical as well. I'm sorta surprised there was so much confusion! haha
Post a Comment